Writing a systematic review of the literature on at-risk

Proceed to Order Help with Writing a Systematic Review Writing a systematic review for your thesis or dissertation proposal takes time because of the amount of research that you must do beforehand in preparing the literature and studies on which you are going to base your research.

Writing a systematic review of the literature on at-risk

Open in a separate window In contrast, systematic review articles B claim that, if possible, they consider all published studies on a specific theme—after the application of previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria The aim is to extract relevant information systematically from the publications.

What is important is to analyze the methodological quality of the included publications and to investigate the reasons for any differences between the results in the different studies.

The results of each study are presented and analyzed according to defined criteria, such as study design and mode of recruitment.

The same applies to the meta-analysis of published data C. In addition, the results are quantitatively summarized using statistical methods and pooled effect estimates glossary are calculated 1. Glossary The summary of individual data Bias Distortion of study results from systematic errors Confidence interval: Confounder A confounder is a factor which is linked to both the studied disease and the studied exposure.

For this reason, it can either enhance or weaken the true association between the disease and the target parameter. Effect estimates An effect estimate, such as the odd ratio or relative risk, estimates the extent of the change in the frequency of a disease caused by a specific exposure.

Exposure Contact with a specific risk factor Forest plot: A forest plot is a graphical representation of the individual studies, as well as the pooled estimate. The effect estimate of each individual study is generally represented on the horizontal or vertical axis, with a confidence interval.

Quick Links

The larger the area of the effect estimate of the individual study, the greater is the weight of the study, as a result of the study size and other factors. The pooled effect estimate is mostly represented in the form of a diamond. In a funnel plot, the study size is plotted against the effect estimates of the individual studies.

writing a systematic review of the literature on at-risk

The variances or the standard error of the effect estimate of the individual studies is given, rather than the study size. Smaller studies give larger variances and standard errors. The effect estimates from large studies are less scattered around the pooled effect estimate than are the effect estimates of small studies.

This gives the shape of a funnel. A publication bias can be visualized with the help of funnel plots. Statistical heterogeneity describes the differences between the studies with respect to the effect estimates. These may be caused by methodological differences between the studies, such as differences in study population or study size, or differences in the methods of measurement.

In individual data, all data e. In medicine and epidemiology, the odds is the ratio of the probability of exposure and the probability of not being exposed. The quotient of the odds of the cases and the odds of the controls gives the odds ratio. For rare diseases, the odds ratio is an approximation to the relative risk.

See individual data Publication bias: Publication bias means that studies which failed to find any influence of exposure on the target disease "negative studies" are more rarely published than studies which showed a positive or statistically significant association.

Publication bias can be visualized with funnel plots. A risk factor modifies the probability of the development of a specific disease. This can, for example, be an external environmental effect or an individual predisposition.

To calculate the relative risk, the probability that an exposed individual falls ill is divided by the probability that a non-exposed person falls ill. The relative risk is calculated on the basis of incident diseases. Using sensitivity analyses, it is examined whether excluding individual studies from the analysis influences the pooled estimate.

This tests the stability of the pooled effect estimate. In subgroup analysis, separate groups in the study population, such as a homogenous ethnic group, are analyzed separately.

A young researcher's guide to a systematic review Editage Insights

A pooled reanalysis D is a quantitative compilation of original data glossary from individual studies for combined analysis 1. The authors of each study included in the analysis then provide individual data glossary. These are then compiled in a combined database and analyzed according to standard criteria fixed in advance.

This form of pooled reanalysis is also referred to as "meta-analysis of individual data".A systematic review answers a defined research question by collecting and summarising all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria.

A meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarise the results of these studies.

The systematic literature review is a method/process/protocol in which a body of literature is aggregated, reviewed and assessed while utilizing pre-specified and standardized techniques. In other words, to reduce bias, the rationale, the hypothesis, and the methods of data collection are prepared before the review and are used as a guide for.

Writing a Systematic Review Outline. Like all other forms of writing, the process of writing a systematic review starts with creating an outline. The writer will develop an outline of the literature review to determine areas of similarities and differences that emerge in the reading.5/5.

HOWTO WRITE A SYSTEmATIC REVIEW: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE 65 VOLUmE 23, JUNE or 6) improve study generalizability. Bear in mind that the purpose of a systematic review . A systematic literature review attempts ‘to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a .

Jul 03,  · Systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses enable the research findings and treatment effects obtained in different individual studies to be summed up and evaluated.

Keywords: literature search, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinical research, epidemiology.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide | pfmlures.com