Break down your critique into divisions, keeping each short and to the point. Use the following as a guide. In your critique, offer general observations supported by specific examples.
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Journal of Women's History It was written in part to challenge the erasure of lesbian existence from so much of scholarly feminist literature, an erasure which I felt and feel to be not just anti-lesbian, but anti-feminist in its consequences, and to distort the experience of heterosexual women as well.
It was not written to widen divisions but to encourage heterosexual feminists to examine heterosexuality as a political institution which disempowers women—and to change it. I also hoped that other lesbians would feel the depth and breadth of woman identification and woman bonding that has run like a continuous though stifled theme through the heterosexual experience, and that this would become increasingly a politically activating impulse, not simply a validation of personal lives.
I wanted the essay to suggest new kinds of criticism, to incite new questions in classrooms and academic journals, and to sketch, at least, some bridge over the gap between lesbian and feminist.
I wanted, at the very least, for feminists to find it less possible to read, write, or teach from a perspective of unexamined heterocentricity. Within the three years since I wrote "Compulsory Heterosexuality"—with this energy of hope and desire—the pressures to conform in a society increasingly conservative in mood have become more intense.
The New Right's messages to women have been, precisely, that we are the emotional and sexual property of men, and that the autonomy and equality of women threaten the family, religion, and state.
The institutions by which women have traditionally been controlled—patriarchal motherhood, economic exploitation, the nuclear family, compulsory heterosexuality—are being strengthened by legislation, religious fiat, media imagery, and efforts at censorship. In a worsening economy, the single mother trying to support her children confronts the feminization of poverty which Joyce Miller of the National Coalition of Labor Union Women has named one of the major issues of the s.
The lesbian, unless in disguise, faces discrimination in hiring and harassment and violence in the street.
Even within feminist-inspired institutions such as battered-women's shelters and Women's Studies programs, open lesbians are fired and others warned to stay in the closet. The retreat into sameness—assimilation for those who can manage it—is the most passive and debilitating of responses to political repression, economic insecurity, and a renewed open season on difference.
At the same time, in the realm of literature which depicts woman bonding and woman identification as essential for female survival, a steady stream of writing and criticism has been coming from women of color in general and lesbians of color in particular—the latter group being even more profoundly erased in academic feminist scholarship by the double bias of racism and homophobia.
The depth of women's rage and fear regarding sexuality and its relation to power and pain is real, even when the dialogue sounds simplistic, self-righteous, or like parallel monologues.
Because of all these developments, there are parts of this essay that I would word differently, qualify, or expand if I were writing it today. But I continue to think that heterosexual feminists will draw political strength for change from taking a critical stance toward the ideology which demands heterosexuality, and that lesbians cannot assume that we are untouched by that ideology and the institutions founded upon it.
There is nothing about such a critique that requires us to think of ourselves as victims, as having been brainwashed If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.
You are not currently authenticated. View freely available titles:I will be writing a Article Critique on the article “The Tyranny of Choice” by Barry Schwartz.
In this Critique I will addressing many psychological concepts, including what is a maximizer and satisficers. This essay will discuss that cultural identity of customers is an important consideration for Haier Group when it develops new product and market, especially when it comes to the class, geography vocation.
The first step in writing an article critique is to figure out what the author is saying.
It's so easy! You can find out what the author is saying if . I wanted the essay to suggest new kinds of criticism, to incite new questions in classrooms and academic journals, and to sketch, at least the bonding against male tyranny, Adrienne Rich's "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence:" A Retrospective.
Next Article. Wars and Thinking. Recommend. Additional Information. I will be composing a Article Critique on the article “The Tyranny of Choice” by Barry Schwartz. In this Critique I will turn toing many psychological constructs.
including what is a maximizer and satisficers. tyranny of choice essaysThe Tyranny of Choice, by Barry Schwartz, discusses both the pros and cons which have resulted from the widened array of choices modern America encounters.
Logically speaking, more choices would root more opportunity, which hypothetically should lead to a general increase in.